
25 May
2019
25 May
'19
10:42 a.m.
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:07 AM Vincent Siles vincent.siles+pyty@gmail.com wrote:
If my understanding is correct, a type-checker will have to parse the whole annotation payload to decide if it supports it or not. That's seems a bit too complicated, doesn't it ? Shouldn't we add a label (like `Annotated[T, 'feature name', X]`, with type alias to shorten the whole thing if need be) to make this decision easier ?
But ISTM the type-checker has to parse the whole payload regardless. Can you elaborate an example of an annotation payload that would be a burden for the type-checker to parse?
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
*Pronouns: he/him/his **(why is my pronoun here?)*
http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/