No, I'd prefer to keep this a separate, dedicated meetup. Most people interested in callable syntax are unlikely to be interested in the specialized topic of Tensor shape types. I don't want either discussion to suffer just because we decided to merge the meetings. But thanks for bringing up the meeting conflict; I'll reschedule this. Revised date: September 20, 2021, 10 am San Francisco time. Agenda: + Overview of proposals + Stats + Pros and cons of different proposals + discussion Let me know if you are interested in presenting pros and cons for your favorite proposal. The document describes the five major proposals so far and how they behave in different scenarios [1]: + shorthand syntax: `(int, str) -> float` + hybrid syntax: `(int, str, c: bool=..., *args: int) -> float` + stub-style syntax: `(a: int, b: str, /, c: bool=..., *args: int) -> float` + shorthand xor stub-style syntax + a couple of other variations We could also invite a couple of interested people from python-dev so that we get early feedback on the viability of these syntax change proposals. [1]: Various proposals and use cases: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11VkNk9N8whxS1SrBv2BNN1Csl5yeTlgG7WyLrCB5... On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:44 AM Alfonso L. Castaño < alfonsoluis.castanom@um.es> wrote:
Yes that's right, we have someone presenting next week. However, how urgent is the Callable thing?
Depending on that there are several options: - Make the meeting longer. - Discuss it briefly during the remaining time. - Discuss it in the following meeting. - Schedule the following meeting in less than one month.
Best, Alfonso. _______________________________________________ Typing-sig mailing list -- typing-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to typing-sig-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/typing-sig.python.org/ Member address: gohanpra@gmail.com
-- S Pradeep Kumar