I'd be in for that as well: an NYC documentation sprint.

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:

That sounds great to me!  I'll happily be the doc steward.  I like the idea of small local sprints.  It's too bad I didn't go to the AGORA thing this weekend, as we could do one there.  Oh well.  But yes, October/November sounds like a great time to do this.  Perhaps we can do one the next time I come to NYC too.

Cameron

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Cameron et al,

This is a very good idea.  Cameron, I think you would be well-suited
to being a documentation steward for yt -- not in terms of *writing*
it, but helping to ensure that the coverage remains high and that
features aren't simply forgotten about as they are submitted.

As for a sprint, I would be very keen to have one, and at the time
when development switches over would be a perfect one.  Since there's
some clustering of yt devs recently, what we could try for is
semi-remote sprints.  Anybody that wanted to come to Columbia, I'd buy
pizza for and we could all write in the same room.  Interested
participants that are clustered at other institutions could work
together, too, and the groups could meet over IRC/Hangouts.

But yes, let's aim for this.  Perhaps sometime in October or November?
 Or is that too soon?

-Matt

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey peeps,
>
> After talking with Matt at some length about the yt documentation, we
> thought it might be a good idea to have a documentation sprint in a few
> months when we've moved over to yt 3.0 as the focus of our development.  The
> docs in general are good, but there are some gaps here and there with some
> functionality not present in the documentation.  I'm not proposing an entire
> (or even partial) rewrite of the docs, as I think that would be
> counterproductive.  I'm simply thinking we could fill in the holes to make
> sure all of the cool stuff in yt is written up so people know how to use it.
>
> Now, I know doc writing is not often fun, but I think this could be really
> beneficial to our user base, and actually cut down on the amount of time we
> have to respond to new users on the mailing list and irc (as well as making
> it easier for people to use yt).
>
> What I'm asking from you is if you encounter something that you don't think
> is well documented in the formal docs (not simply the docstrings), could you
> take a moment to create a bitbucket issue about it?  You don't even have to
> fix it then, just note it, so we know where to work when we do the sprint in
> a few months.
>
> Anyone else have any other ideas about this?
>
> Cameron
>
> --
> Cameron Hummels
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Steward Observatory
> University of Arizona
> http://chummels.org
>

> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

--
Cameron Hummels

Postdoctoral Researcher

Steward Observatory

University of Arizona

http://chummels.org

_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org