Hey Britton,
I just dug into it briefly, and it looks like the particle types for
active particles are not being "set up" the way they ought to be. I
think the issue is that particle_types_raw was not being set
correctly. Adding this line:
self.particle_types_raw = self.particle_types
on line 855 of enzo/data_structures.py fixed it for me. Can you
double-check the values, compare "io" to "DarkMatter" (they should be
identical) and if that looks good to you, submit a PR?
-Matt
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Matthew Turk
Hi all,
Since we've closed the final pull requests, I've now made the repository yt_analysis/yt-3.0 read-only.
If you issue pull requests, please do make sure you issue them from a named branch to the same named branch; bitbucket seems keen on merging across branches lately. :)
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Britton Smith
wrote: Hi all,
After some discussion on the dev mailing list, we've decided to unify the repositories for yt-3.0 and yt. It will still be located in a branch called yt-3.0 in that repository. At some point in the near future the separate yt-3.0 repository will become read-only.
This simply means that if you are using yt normally, from the repository here:
http://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt
you will be able to switch to the yt-3.0 branch more easily. And, if you currently have a fork of the repository yt-3.0, you'll need to switch to using a fork of the main yt repository. This is easy, just fork the main yt repo (unless you already have!) and push your yt-3.0 changes there.
Just as it has always been, installing the "stable" and "development" versions from the install script will still only put you on the latest stable and development versions of yt-2.x. Additionally, doing "yt update" will not accidentally switch you from one version to the other.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Britton and the yt development team
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org