Nathan,

I think that's a pretty good idea. I take this conversation to a new YTEP.

Britton

On Apr 29, 2013 2:38 PM, "Nathan Goldbaum" <goldbaum@ucolick.org> wrote:
Hi Britton,


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
The question I have for people is with regard to process.  In order to have statuses for the unaccepted proposals, they have to exist in some fashion in the main repo.  How do we want to do that?  Or do we want to do that?  One way would be to issue a PR that would include adding it to the index as Draft status and have it be accepted quickly.  People can still leave comments on a merged PR and the author can then issue a new one which moves the listing to the accepted status.

This seems like a sensible approach.  It would also be useful to have a meta-YTEP on the YTEP process so the whole process could be codified somehow.  I could see this existing either within the PEP-0-esque YTEP you've suggested or within a new YTEP.

-Nathan

_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org