I'm +1 as long as we stay true to the idea of these being stable releases.  We are close to getting a testing infrastructure up for yt, so that might make this possible.  Would this be something like yt 2.1.1?

Britton

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
(moved to yt-dev)

Hi all,

This is a great reason to push on a more regular release schedule.

Do you think it might be worthwhile to aim for time-based releases?
We've had a spring release, maybe aim for a Summer release, and then
we could try to just do rolling releases like that?  [+-][01] on
[quarterly|semiannual|annual] releases?

-Matt

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Anthony Harness
<anthony.harness@colorado.edu> wrote:
> Britton,
>
> Adding those lines works for the stable install, which I guess is maintained
> by Hari. My problem was running the unstable install maintained by Stephen,
> which he informed me does not work in parallel. As Stephen mentioned before,
> if Hari could update his development install, I could use that instead.
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Yt-dev mailing list
Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org