Third On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:17 PM, j s oishi <jsoishi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I heartily second this.
j
Hi guys,
It seems that most of yt development has migrated away from the svn-trunk to the various mercurial branches. Like most of you guys, I imagine, I am now using the main hg branch of yt almost exclusively, since that's where everything new that I need gets put right away. It's rare, but every now and then something goes straight into the svn trunk without passing
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith@gmail.com> wrote: through
hg.
Just to make it official, I would like to propose that the svn-trunk not be used for any active development, but only a staging area for updates coming from the hg branch and destined for a release version. This way, we don't run into the issue of having to merge changes in two directions between svn and hg, which I think is a bit of a pain. I get the impression that almost all development is taking place in hg already, but I think it may be beneficial to have an official policy on how this sort of thing should be done.
Thoughts, anybody?
Britton
_______________________________________________ Yt-dev mailing list Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- ---------------- i am dot org: www.jsoishi.org _______________________________________________ Yt-dev mailing list Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Samuel W. Skillman DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellow Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado at Boulder samuel.skillman[at]colorado.edu