I realize that, I just figured it might be nice to choose one upload site and stick with it so that all of the movies were in a single place.  It seemed to me that vimeo had a cleaner interface, and there are already lots of yt-themed videos uploaded, but i'm open to whatever.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
For what it's worth, the ytanalysis user on YouTube (which currently
has the world's ugliest page) can curate playlists, which also can
embed.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on vimeo embeds.  It would also be good if people submitted the vimeo
> embeds to the yt group on vimeo.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds cool to me.  I think vimeo or youtube embeds would be enough.
>> Does anyone have any objections to having movies in the gallery?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Youtube or vimeo embeds would be straightforward.  Embedding raw videos
>>> using a video tag would also work but there might be codec/browser
>>> compatibility issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 20, 2013, Britton Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just want to respond to Cameron's question about the gallery.  I don't
>>>> think it should have to be in a published paper, but I would like it to
>>>> highlight as much of yt's analysis functionality as possible.  There is
>>>> often the temptation too fill it with a bunch of gorgeous renders, which are
>>>> really impressive, but don't really give anyone the impression that yt is
>>>> used for quantitative analysis.  The only real bar I was hoping for
>>>> submissions is that they be something that was used in some sort of
>>>> professional context.  This could be a paper, but also a talk, press
>>>> release, outreach material, or anything that was actual used for a purpose
>>>> other than just making something that's pretty.  In that sense, the gallery
>>>> is basically a place to show off the niche that yt is serving in the real
>>>> world.  Maybe this could even include embedded movies.  Would that be
>>>> possible?
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, please contribute!
>>>>
>>>> Britton
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've updated based on, I think, all of the suggestions (except the
>>>> facebook button, which somebody else needs to get the code for and
>>>> send me) and updated both the deployment and the PR.  Nathan fixed the
>>>> images on the carousel, and I can't take credit for that.  :)
>>>>
>>>> Any other feedback?
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Oh, and the "yt-project" link in the upper left of the header does not
>>>> > link
>>>> > to anything.  it might be good to have that link to Home.  In fact,
>>>> > you
>>>> > might be able to do away with the Home link if you were to do this.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I think it would be useful to have a link to both the stable docs as
>>>> >> well
>>>> >> as the dev docs, if that's an option.  Even with the increased
>>>> >> frequency of
>>>> >> releases, there is still some lag time between dev docs getting
>>>> >> pulled into
>>>> >> the stable.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Under the community page, the last link on the Sharing Scripts header
>>>> >> has
>>>> >> a typo: pastebine.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Under the development page, there is a word missing in the second
>>>> >> sentence: "...the development branch, the and even this website."
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I think the gallery is a great idea--now we just have to populate it.
>>>> >> Is
>>>> >> the idea to show off published work?  Does it have to be published?
>>>> >> Also, I
>>>> >> think we should have people submit both a thumbprint (400x400 as is
>>>> >> done) as
>>>> >> well as a full-res image which is linked through the thumbprint.  Or
>>>> >> perhaps
>>>> >> it's enough that the paper is linked?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So we'll also have another gallery in the docs with images shown as
>>>> >> well
>>>> >> as the cookbook recipes which created them (a la matplotlib)?  I
>>>> >> think that
>>>> >> would be useful.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Overall, I think the page looks good.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Geoffrey So <gsiisg@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "Ah, I agree about the doc link; not sure about the other two. What
>>>> >>> about
>>>> >>> switching blog to being under Quick Links and replacing it with a
>>>> >>> link to
>>>> >>> the latest stable docs? I don't think a search box will quite work
>>>> >>> on the
>>>> >>> toolbar."
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> - Doc would be my first choice, too.  Search is within the doc so it
>>>> >>> would be just one step away, and usually I wouldn't know what to
>>>> >>> search for
>>>> >>> until after I looked at the Docs, so not having search at the
>>>> >>> beginning is
>>>> >>> fine.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "Where should the colors be changed? I do want to brighten the text
>>>> >>> a
>>>> >>> bit, but can you suggest other places?"
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> - I just thought the color template of the Docs looks pretty nice,
>>>> >>> kind
>>>> >>> of similar to python/numpy etc, but I also understand the need for
>>>> >>> the black
>>>> >>> background since we're doing astro, but some addition of bright
>>>> >>> colors would
>>>> >>> help "lighten" the mood (pun intended), so maybe use a brighter
>>>> >>> shade of
>>>> >>> grey for the text, and/or color coded section label.  But I also
>>>> >>> noticed my
>>>> >>> laptop brightness wasn't turned all the way up, so at max brightness
>>>> >>> it is
>>>> >>> not as gloomy as I thought before.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From
>>>> >>> G.S.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Matthew Turk
>>>> >>> <matthewturk@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Hi Geoffrey,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Sep 19, 2013 9:06 PM, "Geoffrey So" <gsiisg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> > These are just personal preference:
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> > I usually use the yt website to
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Hummels
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Steward Observatory
> University of Arizona
> http://chummels.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org



--
Cameron Hummels
Postdoctoral Researcher
Steward Observatory
University of Arizona
http://chummels.org