Will the changes from 2.6 get merged into the 3.0 branch now as well? John ZuHone Laboratory for High-Energy Astrophysics NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Rd., Mail Code 662 Greenbelt, MD 20771 (w) 301-286-2531 (m) 781-708-5004 john.zuhone@nasa.gov jzuhone@gmail.com
On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
+1/+1 on all fronts. My only holdup would've been if `hg up` defaulted to the tip of either branch, but Matt assures me that it does not (there were problems a few years ago with this). Since this is not a problem, I am in favor.
Cameron
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:15 PM, John ZuHone <jzuhone@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
So, in conclusion, should we do this?
+1
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org