+1

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:21 PM, j s oishi <jsoishi@gmail.com> wrote:
These kinds of simulation parameters are good to print. I'm a solid

+1

on both of these changes. I also love print_stats, and having more
data there is a good thing.

j

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose that we increase the verbosity of two operations:
>
> 1) When a parameter file is parsed, I would like several pieces of
> information output via the "INFO" level of the logging handler.  This
> would be the current simulation time, the dimensions of the domain,
> and any cosmological parameters.
> 2) When print_stats is called in the hierarchy, I would like to
> include all of the cosmological parameters.
>
> The reason I'm bringing this up rather than just changing it is that
> in the past yt has (rightly) been accused of being too verbose (in
> fact, it was one of the first things Jeff said to me the first time we
> met to talk about yt!) and I don't want to increase that
> unnecessarily.  But, I feel strongly that as we move into more codes
> we need to be more upfront about what yt thinks of a given simulation
> output.  I think that this will also help ensure that errors are
> avoided.
>
> +1/-1?
>
> -Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Yt-dev mailing list
> Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
_______________________________________________
Yt-dev mailing list
Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org