+1 since this will provide consistency with docs and make more sense for new users.  I support doing this asap so that any bugs can be dealt with prior to release.

Cameron


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stuart Mumford <stuart@mumford.me.uk> wrote:

+1 fwiw

Stuart

On 11 Jun 2014 22:55, "John ZuHone" <jzuhone@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for me.

On Jun 11, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Before 3.0 goes out, how do you all feel about a PR that replaces "pf" with "ds" across the whole codebase?
>
> I think this is worth doing, since it reduces the cognitive load of dealing with yt internals.  One downside is that it will break user scripts if they're using internal APIs.  It will also be a big, difficult-to-review PR.
>
> Now is the time to do this if it ever gets done since there are a large number of other breaking changes in 3.0.
>
> I'd be happy to do this if there's a consensus that it's worth doing.
>
> Nathan
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org




--
Cameron Hummels
Postdoctoral Researcher
Steward Observatory
University of Arizona
http://chummels.org