HI Nathan,
Adding that call did not change the result. To be clear, this is what I
ran:
http://paste.yt-project.org/show/4548/
What is strange is that the logger was clearly set up for parallel as it
correctly prints the different processor numbers. Enable parallelism shows
that parallel_capable is True, so somewhere along the line this is getting
changed.
Britton
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
Hi Britton,
What happens when you call yt.enable_parallelism() at the top of the script?
There were some adjustments to the way parallelism works related to YTEP-0019. See this PR: https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/729/ytep-0019/diff
Do you have a short test script I can try running over here to confirm the issue?
-Nathan
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Britton Smith
wrote: Hi all,
I don't recall when I first noticed this, but I'm finding that the parallel_root_only decorator doesn't seem to be working. A simple test is to run a script that only loads a dataset. The print_key_parameters function is inside of a parallel_root_only decorator, so all that should only be printed by the root processor, but when I run that script in parallel it is printed by all processors. I am still looking into this, but so far I have found that printing the value of parallel_capable inside this decorator always gives False even when running in parallel.
Can someone confirm this? If so, does anyone know what's going on?
Britton
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org