Hi Britton, I was thinking the next one would be 2.2, and that we'd continue with up to 2.9 with just version += 0.1 until we opted to do a 3.0, which I assume would come before 4.5 years from now. Interim bug fixes between releases would be X.X.Y, I was thinking. -Matt On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm +1 as long as we stay true to the idea of these being stable releases. We are close to getting a testing infrastructure up for yt, so that might make this possible. Would this be something like yt 2.1.1?
Britton
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
(moved to yt-dev)
Hi all,
This is a great reason to push on a more regular release schedule.
Do you think it might be worthwhile to aim for time-based releases? We've had a spring release, maybe aim for a Summer release, and then we could try to just do rolling releases like that? [+-][01] on [quarterly|semiannual|annual] releases?
-Matt
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Anthony Harness <anthony.harness@colorado.edu> wrote:
Britton,
Adding those lines works for the stable install, which I guess is maintained by Hari. My problem was running the unstable install maintained by Stephen, which he informed me does not work in parallel. As Stephen mentioned before, if Hari could update his development install, I could use that instead.
Thanks, Anthony
_______________________________________________ yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ Yt-dev mailing list Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ Yt-dev mailing list Yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org