Cool!

On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:

Hi all,

Let's move ahead with this. Starting tomorrow, the GitHub repo will be fiducial. I can send a note to yt-users.

Matt

On Apr 26, 2017 5:28 PM, "John ZuHone" wrote: +1 from me

Sent from my iPhone

...

On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Britton Smith wrote:

Hi Nathan,

+1 from me as well. I was originally in favor of this buffer period when it seemed like there would be more work to do to get things ready, but it seems like everything is all set.

Britton

...

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Turk wrote: Hi,

I am strongly +1 on pulling the trigger switch on May 1. I think we'll gain very little from waiting, and I think we're ready.

...

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: Hi all,

I'd like to propose that we agree to "flip the switch" on switching the main repository to github on May 1. That means that from May 1 we will no longer accept pull requests on bitbucket and we will switch to mirroring from github to bitbucket.

When Matt originally proposed his YTEP, he suggested that we have a "soft" transition where we don't accept new pull requests on bitbucket and also don't accept pull requests on github. This would allow us to process the currently open pull requests and give people some time to move their pull requests over.

I don't think we need to shut down all new development for two weeks. Instead, I think we just need to merge in the pull requests that are mergeable and open on bitbucket and then tell people to port any unmergeable pull requests over to github. Matt putt together some instructions on how to export pull requests here: https://github.com/yt-project/bb-migration/issues/7#issuecomment-296304236

I just looked over the list of open pull requests on bitbucket and I think the following pull requests can be merged:

https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2534 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2537 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2539 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2544 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2560 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2575 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2580 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2584 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2585 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2587 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2589 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2590

If we can get some eyes on these pull requests in particular that would be helpful. I think most or all of them can be merged in as-is, but we need more code reviewers to make sure we can actually do that.

Does anyone have objections to pulling the trigger on the switch to github May 1?

-Nathan

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

congrats on the smooth transition On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:

Hi all,

Let's move ahead with this. Starting tomorrow, the GitHub repo will be fiducial. I can send a note to yt-users.

Matt

On Apr 26, 2017 5:28 PM, "John ZuHone" wrote:

+1 from me

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Britton Smith wrote:

Hi Nathan,

+1 from me as well. I was originally in favor of this buffer period when it seemed like there would be more work to do to get things ready, but it seems like everything is all set.

Britton

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Turk wrote:

...

Hi,

I am strongly +1 on pulling the trigger switch on May 1. I think we'll gain very little from waiting, and I think we're ready.

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote:

...

Hi all,

I'd like to propose that we agree to "flip the switch" on switching the main repository to github on May 1. That means that from May 1 we will no longer accept pull requests on bitbucket and we will switch to mirroring from github to bitbucket.

When Matt originally proposed his YTEP, he suggested that we have a "soft" transition where we don't accept new pull requests on bitbucket and also don't accept pull requests on github. This would allow us to process the currently open pull requests and give people some time to move their pull requests over.

I don't think we need to shut down all new development for two weeks. Instead, I think we just need to merge in the pull requests that are mergeable and open on bitbucket and then tell people to port any unmergeable pull requests over to github. Matt putt together some instructions on how to export pull requests here: https://github.com/yt-project/bb-migration/issues/7#is suecomment-296304236

I just looked over the list of open pull requests on bitbucket and I think the following pull requests can be merged:

https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2534 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2537 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2539 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2544 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2560 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2575 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2580 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2584 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2585 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2587 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2589 https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/2590

If we can get some eyes on these pull requests in particular that would be helpful. I think most or all of them can be merged in as-is, but we need more code reviewers to make sure we can actually do that.

Does anyone have objections to pulling the trigger on the switch to github May 1?

-Nathan

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

-- Michael Zingale Associate Professor Dept. of Physics & Astronomy • Stony Brook University • Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800 *phone*: 631-632-8225 *e-mail*: Michael.Zingale@stonybrook.edu *web*: http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/mzingale github: http://github.com/zingale