Unit refactor, Trello, SPH, etc
Hi all, Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs: https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor. Big blockers: * MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units: https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers... * Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style. I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default. So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization. I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included. We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish. Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo. -Matt
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units: https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers... * Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
Parallelism/buffer interface issues still needs to be looked at.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
This is the Eris simulation at z=0, visualized with SPH smoothing fields: http://imgur.com/a/Fx5VL A few of you have already seen this, I just thought it was too cool not to share.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units:
https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers... * Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
Not to sound like a broken record, but have the docs covering the unit refactor, SPH smoothing, and all of the other new things in unit refactor been written? Or are you just talking here about moving the yt-docs repository (which only covers yt 2.x) into the yt-3.0 branch of the yt repository? I'm excited to use the new yt, but I just want to make sure I know how and it is clear how it all works under the hood.
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units:
https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers... * Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
Not to sound like a broken record, but have the docs covering the unit refactor, SPH smoothing, and all of the other new things in unit refactor been written? Or are you just talking here about moving the yt-docs repository (which only covers yt 2.x) into the yt-3.0 branch of the yt repository? I'm excited to use the new yt, but I just want to make sure I know how and it is clear how it all works under the hood.
The units docs have been written, and all of the bootcamps have been updated. I have not yet written the smoothing docs. But, the bullet point I meant was just about copying the docs in.
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units:
https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers...
* Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
Not to sound like a broken record, but have the docs covering the unit refactor, SPH smoothing, and all of the other new things in unit refactor been written? Or are you just talking here about moving the yt-docs repository (which only covers yt 2.x) into the yt-3.0 branch of the yt repository? I'm excited to use the new yt, but I just want to make sure I know how and it is clear how it all works under the hood.
The units docs have been written, and all of the bootcamps have been updated. I have not yet written the smoothing docs. But, the bullet point I meant was just about copying the docs in.
Great to hear it! Is it possible to get the smoothing docs in with this PR since this PR includes the smoothing functionality? Good luck today!
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been trying to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units:
https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers... * Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
Not to sound like a broken record, but have the docs covering the unit refactor, SPH smoothing, and all of the other new things in unit refactor been written? Or are you just talking here about moving the yt-docs repository (which only covers yt 2.x) into the yt-3.0 branch of the yt repository? I'm excited to use the new yt, but I just want to make sure I know how and it is clear how it all works under the hood.
The units docs have been written, and all of the bootcamps have been updated. I have not yet written the smoothing docs. But, the bullet point I meant was just about copying the docs in.
Great to hear it! Is it possible to get the smoothing docs in with this PR since this PR includes the smoothing functionality?
Right now the next time I see myself being able to devote a sustained set of time to docs is mid- to late-March. Between now and then I have too many obligations both time-wise and related to development with tight deadlines. Assuming no one else wants to write them, then waiting on including them will have to wait until then. So whether the PR gets accepted or not -- which is pretty much the same as saying whether or not we can use mainline yt-3.0 for SPH analysis, unit refactor stuff, etc -- is dependent on that. The items that will require documenting: * The method being used (relatively short) * How to add new fields (relatively short) * How to load and utilize particle data (more complex) While these seem somewhat straightforward, I am concerned that they will require attention I can't devote at the moment as a result of too many Pretzel Money situations I've found myself in. ("Where is the pretzel money? When are you going to get the pretzel money? And so on.") So rather than say, I will do these next, I am trying to be realistic. -Matt
Good luck today!
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH support with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
Nathan, John, Matt, Britton, (in distance from me order), This is really great! From what I've used in the units and what I've seen of the smoothing it looks like these pieces are all starting to fall into place. As for Trello, people that aren't familiar with it might want to check out how Trello developers develop Trello using Trello. Yeah. https://trello.com/b/nC8QJJoZ/trello-development Cheers, Sam On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Lately, a lot of the yt-3.0 dev has been going on in the unitrefactor domain. Britton, John, Nathan and I (in alphabetical order :) have been pushing pretty hard on getting things in order. I've been
wrote: trying
to keep things organized a bit by using Trello, which Sam showed me and was pretty cool -- I'm not sure I can give out access to writing to the boards to anybody, but I think the yt boards are all "public" readable, and you can request write privs:
https://trello.com/b/yv7o0dTp/unit-refactor
Anyway, as an update, here's where we stand on unit refactor.
Big blockers:
* MOAB, GDF, Pluto, Chombo frontends * A few remaining (minor) cosmology issues that Britton's just about got finished and for which I owe some unit tests * Some discussion about metallicity units:
https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt/pull-request/38/fixing-cgs-unit-convers...
* Docs haven't been copied in yet, but John Z has updated the bootcamp to 3.0 (units) style.
Not to sound like a broken record, but have the docs covering the unit refactor, SPH smoothing, and all of the other new things in unit refactor been written? Or are you just talking here about moving the yt-docs repository (which only covers yt 2.x) into the yt-3.0 branch of the yt repository? I'm excited to use the new yt, but I just want to make sure I know how and it is clear how it all works under the hood.
The units docs have been written, and all of the bootcamps have been updated. I have not yet written the smoothing docs. But, the bullet point I meant was just about copying the docs in.
Great to hear it! Is it possible to get the smoothing docs in with this PR since this PR includes the smoothing functionality?
Right now the next time I see myself being able to devote a sustained set of time to docs is mid- to late-March. Between now and then I have too many obligations both time-wise and related to development with tight deadlines.
Assuming no one else wants to write them, then waiting on including them will have to wait until then. So whether the PR gets accepted or not -- which is pretty much the same as saying whether or not we can use mainline yt-3.0 for SPH analysis, unit refactor stuff, etc -- is dependent on that.
The items that will require documenting:
* The method being used (relatively short) * How to add new fields (relatively short) * How to load and utilize particle data (more complex)
While these seem somewhat straightforward, I am concerned that they will require attention I can't devote at the moment as a result of too many Pretzel Money situations I've found myself in. ("Where is the pretzel money? When are you going to get the pretzel money? And so on.") So rather than say, I will do these next, I am trying to be realistic.
-Matt
Good luck today!
I think that's ... just about it. At some point, maybe not *immediately*, we also want to get non-CGS units much, much easier to set as the default.
So, the other thing -- we *just* landed (in unit refactor) SPH
support
with smoothing fields. More on this is forthcoming, but I'm pretty pleased with where it is now, and best of all there's room for improvement and optimization.
I'm going to be traveling a good amount the next couple weeks, but I hope to be able to address the remaining blockers, and then we can land the unit refactor in mainline yt-3.0 at some point after the documentation is included.
We'll let that sit for a while, and then at some point the "rebranding" PR (which will be more invasive technically, but *less* invasive API-wise) can be issued, tested, and landed. I actually think it might be reasonable to get 3.0 out ... kind of soon-ish.
Anyway, if you want to test it out, grab the unitrefactor bookmark from MatthewTurk/yt ; I'll update the PR into the main yt repository as soon as these next couple PRs pass into my repo.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
participants (4)
-
Cameron Hummels -
Matthew Turk -
Nathan Goldbaum -
Sam Skillman