Hello Matt,

Thanks, that seems to have done fixed the issue. I am seeing that the graph looks very different now compared to before. Would forgetting the extra zone change the appearance of the overall plot beyond edge effects?

Thank you,
Nathan Butcher

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nathan,

Yup, I agree with your assessment -- there's an edge effect.  You need
one more thing to get the derivative field working; you need to tell
yt to give you an extra zone in each direction.  You can do that by
changing your decorator for the derived field to:

@derived_field(name = "GravGradientX", validators = [ValidateSpatial(1)])

I don't believe you need any additional changes inside the source
code.  Let us know if that fixes it!

-Matt

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Nathan Butcher <butchernate@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using an Enzo dataset, I have written a function to find the derivative in
> the x-direction of a field. When I try to plot the derivative, I see lines
> that throughout the plot that I'm guessing are due to the edges of cells.
> The attached plot is a slice of the x-direction derivative of the
> PotentialField viewed down the x-axis, but this error appears in plots for
> density and pressure as well. I am new to using yt, and I am not sure what
> is causing this.
>
> Thank you,
> Nathan Butcher
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users@lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
_______________________________________________
yt-users mailing list
yt-users@lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org