Hey Nathan,
This is great - thanks!
-d
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Desika Narayanan
wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to understand some of the stellar ages that the Tipsy example data (the isolated galaxy) at:
When I examine the formation time with the super-simple script:
http://paste.yt-project.org/show/5501/
I get:
max star age: 100.000499852 Gyr
I thought normally the formation time was the current simulation time minus the stellar age for Tipsy outputs - am I interpreting this wrongly?
Hi Desika,
I encountered this before. Take a look at the following section of the docs, which makes use of this dataset:
http://yt-project.org/docs/dev/analyzing/filtering.html#filtering-particle-f...
I don't have a copy of gasoline to confirm this, but the conclusion I came to is that the stars in the initial conditions for this simulation were given a creation time arbitrarily far in the future, generating spurious stellar ages.
If you instead define particle filters for formed stars like so:
def young_stars(pfilter, data): age = data.ds.current_time - data[pfilter.filtered_type, "creation_time"] filter = np.logical_and(age.in_units('Myr') <= 5, age >= 0) return filter
def old_stars(pfilter, data): age = data.ds.current_time - data[pfilter.filtered_type, "creation_time"] filter = np.logical_or(age.in_units('Myr') >= 5, age < 0) return filter
where I've arbitrarily chosen 5 Myr as the cutoff for old stars and young stars, you'll find that your results make more sense.
HTH,
Nathan
Thanks, desika
_______________________________________________ yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org