Thanks in advanceHi Matt,I'm using simple data from the enzo Collapse Test (27).
thanks for the quick reply.
It seems is mainly related to the size of the sphere I'm taking... but I don't know.
Here following a piece of my script:
sph3 = pf3.h.sphere(c3, (100, 'pc'))
lw=1.5, linestyle='--', color='r')
lw=1.5, linestyle=':', color='y')
StefanoOn Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Turk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Without knowing what "data" here is, or how you generated it, it's tough to say.On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> I did a simple test with enzo and I tried to plot a radial profile of the
> chemical species fractions with YT.
> The problem is that if I use the YT function which intrinsically plot the
> fraction for a species, let's say H2I_Fraction (as usual), and compare this
> with a direct evaluation of the mass fraction:
> I obtain some slightly different results, mostly at large radii.
> Anyone might explain this discrepancy!? This happens with all the species.
> Thank you in advance
> yt-users mailing list
yt-users mailing list