Hi Matt,
Sorry to re-visit this issue but while your fix totally solved the
previous problem, I have unearthed a second.
If I create a scg, the "z" position is correct up to the first & last
handful of cells. At this point, is mysteriously starts to decrease
along with associate changes in density and acceleration fields.
e.g.
scg details: AMRSmoothedCoveringGrid
(GR_Enzo2_128amr5_zeus_turb_psupp_rr_0001): level=3, left_edge=[ 0.
31. 0.], right_edge=[ 64. 33. 64.], ActiveDimensions=[2048 64
2048]
z position for z-index 2035-2047: [ 63.609375 63.640625 63.671875
63.703125 63.734375 63.765625
62.796875 60.828125 57.859375 53.890625 48.921875 42.953125]
z position for z-index 0-20: [ 28.015625 21.046875 15.078125
10.109375 6.140625 3.171875
1.203125 0.234375 0.265625 0.296875 0.328125 0.359375
0.390625 0.421875 0.453125 0.484375 0.515625 0.546875
0.578125 0.609375]
The same is true in the x direction but the (smaller) y direction is fine:
y position for y-index 40-63: [ 32.265625 32.296875 32.328125
32.359375 32.390625 32.421875
32.453125 32.484375 32.515625 32.546875 32.578125 32.609375
32.640625 32.671875 32.703125 32.734375 32.765625 32.796875
32.828125 32.859375 32.890625 32.921875 32.953125]
y position for y-index 0-20: [ 31.015625 31.046875 31.078125
31.109375 31.140625 31.171875
31.203125 31.234375 31.265625 31.296875 31.328125 31.359375
31.390625 31.421875 31.453125 31.484375 31.515625 31.546875
31.578125 31.609375]
The script that generates that output is here:
http://paste.yt-project.org/show/2454/
I actually end up chopping out the middle of my data and using it
someplace else, so it's maybe not a problem but it is a bit worrying.
Elizabeth
On 5 June 2012 23:37, Matthew Turk
Hi Elizabeth,
Sorry for the delay. I have identified the problem.
Your covering grid was only selecting level 0 grids. This resulted in the smoothed covering grid making an early exit. I've added additional steps to produce grid-free refinement/interpolation to higher-levels in changeset 2cd5fa6d84ae.
-Matt
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Elizabeth Tasker
wrote: Hi Matt,
It's a possiblity; John reverted some changes several weeks ago, but I thought that restored it to the previous operations. None of the answer tests have thrown anything, and they do test this functionality.
Can you provide a script (pastebinned) that I can run? And, what's the size of your domain? 32, 32, 32 for extent, and dims of ... 128^3?
Actually, double my usual:
64 x 64 x 64 kpc boxsize 256 root 3 AMR (static grids)
This script produces nothing good:
http://paste.yt-project.org/show/2414/
Elizabeth
_______________________________________________ yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
yt-users mailing list yt-users@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org