[python-advocacy] Forrester Research Survey Answers for Review
kryswilken at gmail.com
Mon May 28 13:23:46 CEST 2007
Very nice work! :) Some of those questions were not obvious to me. You did a
good job answering them.
The only $0.02 I would add is in F14. I think I would mention that radability
is not only something that Python has, but it is one of the core philosophies
of the language and community.
Anyway, great work! I also like Sean's feedback too.
On Sunday 27 May 2007 06:00, advocacy-request at python.org wrote:
> Whew! I've finished filling out the survey response to Forrester Research
> and it was much harder than I expected. I'll be delivering it to them on
> Tuesday morning, so I'm making it available online to the community for
> correction and final input.
> At this stage I'm looking for blatant errors, embarrassing claims and
> overlooked significant features. Some of the questions called for an essay
> answer but I'm only permitted a few paragraphs and had to boil matters down
> quite a big.
> Anyway, if anyone is around this holiday weekend, I'd appreciate a quick
> skim, especially by anyone associated with Jython or IronPython, as I might
> have misunderstood something and made claims that aren't precisely
> accurate. It goes into a spreadsheet and the cell numbers are next to each
> response, so you can refer to those.
> I think afterward I may turn this into a whitepaper, with somewhat expanded
> answers, to recycle the effort.
More information about the Advocacy