[AstroPy] proposal for astropy version control software and respository
erwin at mpe.mpg.de
Sat Jul 16 06:52:20 EDT 2011
I'm concerned that this poll is perhaps a little premature and not
sufficiently well justified. It feels a trifle too much like "A small
group of us got together and decided what to do; we're not really
interested in your input or in explaining our reasons or in having a
wider discussion first, so just vote on it."
(I realize I'm way overdoing the atrribution of sinister motives here,
and I apologize; but this is in rather stark constrast with the ongoing
discussion over documentation, which seems to be progressing well in
evaluating the various alternatives and answering questions raised....)
So... unpack, please!
* Why git, and not mercurial (or even bazaar)?
(My understanding is that mercurial -- which I've used -- is closer
in syntax and commands to subversion than is the case for git, which
argues for mercurial as possibly more accessible to people who
haven't worked with either before, but who have worked with svn or
* Why github, and not, say Bitbucket or Google Code?
(I'm not saying that this has to be a long, drawn-out discussion by any
means; but at the moment the haste and lack of justification tempts me
to vote "No" largely as method of protest.)
On Jul 15, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Perry Greenfield wrote:
> Given discussions at scipy (consisting primarily of a good number of
> people from STScI, CFA/Chandra, and Gemini) it seemed clear to most of
> us there that the most straightforward choice for the astropy version
> control software and repository was git and github. This is what most
> of the science-based Python projects are using and they generally seem
> quite happy with it. Since we are encouraging distributed
> contributions, it also would seem we should favor a distributed vcs
> over a non-distributed one (i.e., svn). So we (Erik, Tom and me) are
> proposing that we simply put this particular choice to a yes/no vote.
> Here is a link to the poll:
> Should there be a significant level of objection to this, we'll look
> at seeing if there is a stronger consensus for something else.
> AstroPy mailing list
> AstroPy at scipy.org
Peter Erwin Max-Planck-Insitute for Extraterrestrial
erwin at mpe.mpg.de Physics, Giessenbachstrasse
tel. +49 (0)89 30000 3695 85748 Garching, Germany
fax +49 (0)89 30000 3495 http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~erwin
More information about the AstroPy