[AstroPy] Proliferating py-astro-libs
Erik Bray
embray at stsci.edu
Wed Jun 15 09:50:48 EDT 2011
On 06/14/2011 04:50 PM, Erik Tollerud wrote:
> Actually, I think it might be better to have a smallish group do this
> (3-5), assuming enough are willing. But otherwise, I think the
> wikispace-based nomination process makes sense.
>
> I think more than one is better mainly because the BDFL/BDFN model may
> not be entirely fitting here. It works well for Python because Guido
> wrote the initial code base himself, so it already had a clear vision.
> In this case, we're talking about combining a number of disparate
> approaches and ways of working, so a group with somewhat different
> perspectives makes sense. But as long as it's small enough (3 is
> probably ideal), it hopefully will still be able to quickly agree on a
> unified approach.
+1 to this. I was thinking it might be a bit awkward to have one person
who didn't write or even originate 99% of the code we're talking about
dictating those projects. Of course, even with 3 or 5 people you still
have people making decisions for projects that they did not create. But
making it a handful of people instead of just one person is still an
improvement. It makes the personality of the BDFL less of an issue.
Erik
More information about the AstroPy
mailing list