[AstroPy] Bug in wcs_world2pix?
Thomas Robitaille
thomas.robitaille at gmail.com
Fri Sep 19 09:14:34 EDT 2014
Ah of course, this is indeed what is going on here! I agree that it's
worth thinking about whether cases like this should return an error.
In the past (in WCSAxes) I've simply checked if the coordinate
round-trips in order to determine if it's in the observational plane,
but it may be more sensible to simply return NaN.
Cheers,
Tom
On 19 September 2014 14:14, David Berry <d.berry at jach.hawaii.edu> wrote:
> Am I missing something? This is a TAN projection centred on CRVAL1=16,
> CRVAL2=23. Since it is a TAN projection, the projection plane only
> includes half the sky - i.e. the hemisphere centred on (16,23). But
> the test point (211,-26) is not contained within this hemisphere and
> so is not included in the TAN projection plane. In other words, no
> pixel has the coordinates RA=211 Dec=-26, and so the results of using
> wcs.wcs_world2pix should be NaN, or "invalid", or something.
>
> Unless I'm missing something...
>
> David
>
>
> On 19 September 2014 12:58, Bob Garwood <bgarwood at nrao.edu> wrote:
>> I suspect what's going on here has to do with the specific CD matrix, which
>> includes rotation. I think because of that rotation the world coordinate
>> actually maps back in to the grid at the antipode. I haven't checked this by
>> hand to see if that's the case.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> On September 19, 2014 7:47:30 AM EDT, Howard Bushouse <bushouse at stsci.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Huh. But that’s not how astronomers measure RA and Dec, even when
>>> translated to degrees. If I’ve got an object with an RA of 17:45:00.0
>>> (hh:mm:ss.w) the RA in degrees is 266.25. We *never* use a negative RA.
>>> Instead of a range of -180 to 180, we use 0 to 360. Dec is the only one that
>>> ever goes negative (-90 to +90, as you indicated).
>>>
>>> -hb
>>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe at stsci.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The range of ra and dec is (-180, 180) and (-90, 90) respectively.
>>>> (211, -26) is equivalent to (31, 26).
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On 09/18/2014 05:04 PM, Maik Riechert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having some great trouble currently and am a bit confused to!
>>>>> o:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wcs = WCS(header)
>>>>> x,y = wcs.wcs_world2pix(211, -26, 0)
>>>>> print x,y # 836.316942718 658.26364248
>>>>> ra,dec = wcs.wcs_pix2world(x, y, 0)
>>>>> print ra, dec # 31.0 26.0
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems like world2pix gives me bogus results. I was expecting values
>>>>> way outside my image area (image size is 4256x2832). Am I doing
>>>>> something obvious wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> The WCS headers can be seen at http://pastebin.com/JrdiL949
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the help,
>>>>> Maik
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> AstroPy mailing list
>>>>> AstroPy at scipy.org
>>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Droettboom
>>>> Science Software Branch
>>>> Space Telescope Science Institute
>>>>
>>>> http://www.droettboom.com
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> AstroPy mailing list
>>>> AstroPy at scipy.or!
>>>> g
>>>>
>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> AstroPy mailing list
>>> AstroPy at scipy.org
>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AstroPy mailing list
>> AstroPy at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AstroPy mailing list
> AstroPy at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
More information about the AstroPy
mailing list