[BangPypers] which is better solution of the question

[Anand Chitipothu]

>
> Don't use sorted(..., reverse=True). Instead reverse the list in place
> by using reverse slicing of l[-1::-1], which is about 1.5 times faster.

Why are you using [-1::-1] for reversing? Isn't [::-1] the python
idiom for reversing a list?