[BangPypers] Python 1.5.2 Application (compiled on PA-RISC)

Wah Meng Wong wah_meng at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 17 09:10:46 CET 2011


Hello Noufal,

>> Yes I will go for the python 2.5.2 as I found the source code on HP's
>>website.  Will be doing that for HP-UX 11.31, Itanium platform.

> Why go for that? Why not use the source from the official site? Does HP
> maintain patches for their own platform?

I am not sure if HP maintains patches for their own platform... as I said I am 
not familiar in this space. Ok I will try looking at the source codes in 
official site. BTW, you mean 2.5.2 is okay right? Your "too far" was referring 
to HP website instead of the versioning of python right? 


I will have to have 2 versions of python running, at least, Windows x86 and 
HP-UX Itanium 64-bit. Also possibly Linux too. 


As for the Windows platform, do you think there is available binary out there 
and I don't have to recompile, or the build will also be as "straight forward" 
as other platforms? 


Regards,
Wah Meng


________________________________

From: "bangpypers-request at python.org" <bangpypers-request at python.org>
To: bangpypers at python.org
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:00:01 PM
Subject: BangPypers Digest, Vol 41, Issue 25

Send BangPypers mailing list submissions to
    bangpypers at python.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    bangpypers-request at python.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    bangpypers-owner at python.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of BangPypers digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Python 1.5.2 Application (compiled on PA-RISC)
      (Noufal Ibrahim)
   2. Re: [JOB] Python developer required in Pune with web
      development experience (Kenneth Gonsalves)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:03:02 +0530
From: Noufal Ibrahim <noufal at gmail.com>
To: Bangalore Python Users Group - India <bangpypers at python.org>
Subject: Re: [BangPypers] Python 1.5.2 Application (compiled on
    PA-RISC)
Message-ID: <87tyhbbwrl.fsf at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, Jan 14 2011, Wah Meng Wong wrote:


[...]

>> That would be my first guess (especially since it's the binary
>> crashing). Is it not an option to get the sources and try to recompile
>> it for ia64 HP-UX?
>
> Yes it is an option however I am not familiar with the rebuild process so this 

> is my last resort. Looks like I have no choice but to rebuild. 

It should be fairly straightforward. You *might* have to skip some
optional modules (e.g. ctypes) for which the necessary supporting
libraries might not be there on your system but that should be okay.

> Can I ping you if I encounter any issue? (I haven't been doing this
> for 10 years)

Sure. I can't guarantee a reply though

>> It's possible but I don't think you'd get much out of a non-debug
>> build of your binary. 
>
> Yes however I don't have a copy of the debug build of python. 

Well then, you *can* do it but I don't think you'd get anything out of
it. 


>> I'd try the latest 2.x (2.7something right now) series. It will have bug
>> fixes which 1.xb doesn't have.
>
> Yes I will go for the python 2.5.2 as I found the source code on HP's
> website.  Will be doing that for HP-UX 11.31, Itanium platform.

Why go for that? Why not use the source from the official site? Does HP
maintain patches for their own platform?


[...]


-- 


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:03:48 +0530
From: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org>
To: Bangalore Python Users Group - India <bangpypers at python.org>
Subject: Re: [BangPypers] [JOB] Python developer required in Pune with
    web development experience
Message-ID: <1295001228.1823.772.camel at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 15:46 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> Good point. "Industry standard" is just euphemism and
> an urban myth, no such thing exists :) 

thank god - I can stop trying to find out what it is.
-- 
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers at python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers


End of BangPypers Digest, Vol 41, Issue 25
******************************************



      


More information about the BangPypers mailing list