[BangPypers] Practical experiences with uWSGI?

[Sreekanth S Rameshaiah]

On 18 May 2011 18:25, Sirtaj Singh Kang <sirtaj at sirtaj.net> wrote:

>
> Thanks for the reply, Sree. If I might pick your brain further -
>
> On 18-May-11, at 6:13 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote:
> [snip]
>
>  We have used it in one large scale project which is due to go live in next
>> few days.
>>
>
> What was the reasoning behind choosing it over apache+mod_wsgi? What are
> the deal-breaker features that you'd miss if you went back to mod_wsgi?


If we had our say, we would have settled for apache+ mod_wsgi.
Client was techie organisation and they felt nginx + uwsgi will perform
better. Our research showed that in a fully dynamic environment it makes no
difference. In a usecase where lot of static (both text/ binary) content get
served, there may be performance gain in nginx + uwsgi.
We just follow the client's directive as both almost had similar
performance.

- sree