[BangPypers] Return values
Vishal
vsapre80 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 20 21:27:11 CEST 2014
Dear Noufal,
Have not gone through all the replies...so may be i am repeating...may be I
am not in my senses :))
I would create a "stats_bundle" object, with members like stats_val
and stats_list,
which are initialized to None. So you always get a stats_bundle object
which you can pass around to the handler function in the calling code.
Since one of the above members is always going to be None, a simple check
in the handler will be fine..i guess.
But all this is stylistic...so it depends.
Take care,
Vishal
Thanks and best regards,
Vishal Sapre
---
Please DONT print this email, unless you really need to. Save Energy &
Paper. Save the Earth.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Sriram Karra <karra.etc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV <noufal at nibrahim.net.in
> >
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > From the thread so far, Anand's solution is the one I like
> > best. Although it's something tailored for my problem rather than a
> > general pattern.
> >
>
>
> Anand's solution is good. But with the added context you have given - why
> are you not creating classes for CPU and Machine, with get_stats() and
> set_stats() methods for them? Something like:
>
> class CPU:
> def set_stats (self, cpu_t):
> self.cpu_stats = cpu_t
>
> def get_stats (self):
> return self.cpu_stats
>
> class Machine:
> def __init__ (self, n_cpus):
> self.cpus = [CPU() for i in range(0, n_cpus)]
>
> def fetch_stats (self):
> stats_list = psutils.get_cpu_stats()
> for i, stat in enumerate(stats_list):
> cpu[i].set_stats(stat)
>
> self.cpu_stats_summary = psutils.get_cpu_stats(summary=True)
>
> def get_cpu_stats_summary (self):
> return self.cpu_stats_summary
> _______________________________________________
> BangPypers mailing list
> BangPypers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
>
More information about the BangPypers
mailing list