[Baypiggies] Meeting locations

[Marilyn Davis]

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Aahz wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006, Marilyn Davis wrote:
> >
> > Here I am again, going back to the architecture.  Why do we meet at
> > both sites?  It seems that the Google meetings are better attended and
> > the acoustics are better.
> > 
> > Both places are super-cool.
> 
> It's partly an accident of historical timing and mostly a deliberate
> decision.  When we lost our Stanford meeting location, IronPort was the
> first to offer a space, and we saw no reason to stop meeting there just
> because Google offered a space.  In addition, there have always been
> people who complained that Stanford was too far south (let alone Google),
> and IronPort has much better access to public transit.
> 

Can anyone speak for meetings at Ironport, or against having all
regular meetings at Google?

Stephen, do your survey results show that we should maintain two
sites?

Will anyone take it personally if we have just the Google site?

Marilyn