[Baypiggies] Meeting location (was Videotaping presentations)
marilyn at deliberate.com
Sat Jun 3 00:34:13 CEST 2006
------- On Friday, June 2, 2006 aahz at pythoncraft.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006, Marilyn Davis wrote:
>> ----- On Friday, June 2, 2006 aahz at pythoncraft.com wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006, Marilyn Davis wrote:
>>>> Again, what is the reason for having the confusion and complication of
>>>> two meeting sites when one has creature-discomforts and is harder to
>>>> reach for many more people?
>>> Do other people agree that IronPort is really that much more
>>> uncomfortable than Google? Believe me, I'm extremely sympathetic to the
>>> issue of acoustics, but there have also been a number of people who can
>>> get to IronPort but not Google. As long as that is a significant
>>> population, I don't think we should cut them out. Perhaps finding
>> I thought that Stephen's survey discovered that there are many more
>> people who can get to Google but not Ironport than vice-versa. And I
>> think it showed that the further north and east, the fewer people.
>>From my POV, it wouldn't matter if there were five hundred people who
> could get to Google but not IronPort, as long as there are at least ten
> or fifteen people who can get to IronPort but not Google. And, yes, I'm
Really? I don't understand that point of view.
> speaking as someone for whom Google is much easier to reach than
> IronPort. BayPIGgies is for the SF Bay Area Python community, and I
That's what I mean about geography. I don't understand why one club would claim to be *the* club for the whole bay area. It seems a bit greedy. If this club, which has its geographic center determined by the fact that meetings were at Stanford for so long, relinguishes its claim on so much geography, there would be an opening for more clubs in the bay area. I'd rather encourage more clubs, and encourage speakers to travel, than to expect the audience to travel around the bay.
If there are 10 or 15 people who can get to Ironport, but not Google, maybe our speakers would be willing to do both places, saving lots of gas and collective travel time.
> think an important aspect of community is making community resources
> available to as many different members of the community as possible,
> rather than maximizing the resources given to "central" members of the
Which resources are we talking about? We're not talking about "central" members, but a large majority of the members. Alex, it's not selfish to argue for what the majority wants. Ignoring the majority for some vague notion of geographic dominance, or for maintaining status quo, or whatever is driving this, is illogical and self-defeating for the club.
And again, I wonder about the decision-making process here. Is it that Aahz decides, even though he doesn't go to meetings? And this is because he runs the email list? JJ has volunteered to do the email list because Aahz has complained that he doesn't have time. What happened with that?
I seem to be missing the sense in all this. Aahz, where are you coming from?
p.s. Is there anyone willing to tape at Ironport? If not, then that's another minus for Ironport.
> If there are only five or ten people who can get to IronPort but not
> Google, that changes the equation a bit -- it certainly is possible to
> reach a point of diminishing returns.
> Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) http://www.pythoncraft.com/
> "I saw `cout' being shifted "Hello world" times to the left and stopped
> right there." --Steve Gonedes
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
More information about the Baypiggies