[Baypiggies] Challenge/Response email systems
annaraven at gmail.com
Sat Jun 17 08:03:30 CEST 2006
On 6/16/06, Marilyn Davis <marilyn at deliberate.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your comments.
> I guess the social aspects are a matter of taste.
Could be. I tend to be pretty prickly about some things. ;-)
> > Ick! I had clicked on "reply to all" to send my response to the
> > lmailing list and it sent a copy automatically to Marilyn. Instead of
> > the usual "reply to this email" challenge, it expects me to click on a
> > link!
> I haven't looked at other CR systems in a long time. They used to all
> go to the web. I don't quite understand how to do it as a reply-to-
> the-email-message. The challenge would have one image in the email
> and ask you to put the response where? The nice thing about going to
> the web is that we can give people several chances to get it right.
Um, what image? I never clicked on the link. I don't click on links
unless I've specifically asked for something and am expecting and
looking for it. I never asked for a challenge.
> The 'reply to this email' auto-responders that I am aware of are not
> spam preventers, not CR, but Joe Job preventers, called "confirmation"
> messages. Like, when you made a request to join this list, you
> received an email asking you to confirm your subscription request.
I've gotten "reply to this email" messages for getting through
spam-blocks for friends' eddresses in the past. This is the first time
I've seen an eddress protection that expects me to click on a link.
> > Talk about a way for spammers to get real eddresses (oh yes, click
> > here!) I don't remember every single person I may have emailed (yes -
> > I probably *do* send far too much email) so no way would I just click
> > on some random link that happened to be in an email. The *least* I
> > would expect would be a copy of my original email to Marilyn so I
> > could at least judge whether it's a legitimate challenge to something
> > I actually sent or something out of the blue from some spammer,
> > without making me have to search through my sent box.
> The challenge comes right away, unless the network is broken. It
> bears the subject line, although it would be a nit to include more of
> the message. So thank you, I'll think about it. Maybe a the first 10
> lines would be a help to someone.
It would to me. Normally, I hit send and then log out and go on to the
rest of my life. I may or may not go back to that eddress any time in
the next hour or more (or the next day if it's a work eddress). In
which time, I've had 200 emails show up, probably burying any C/R
message. By then, no - I won't remember. Especially if it's someone I
don't know all that well.
> > [shudder] Sorry but this is a really unpleasant variant of the
> > challenge/response system, imho.
> I don't know. I'll think about it. But if you just sent me a message
> and yet you don't trust a link I send right back to you
That I get 6 hours later or more? You're assuming something here - I
don't always go back to my inbox after hitting send. In fact,
*usually* I move onto another window or [gasp] do something offline
> , or don't
> remember that you sent me a personal message, well, I guess I lose
> that one. I guess it wasn't so personal after all?
So, you're saying I just shouldn't ever write to anyone that I don't
know well enough to immediately recognize their name/eddress in a
screen of 200 emails?
Hrmmm. Not too sure I agree with that one.
> Anyhow, I do appreciate people taking the time to think about this
> with me. And I'm glad that the arguments seem to have come down to
And assumptions about behavior.
It is fate, but call it Italy if it pleases you, Vicar!
More information about the Baypiggies