[Baypiggies] Let's welcome the new year!

[m h]

What about the self categorizing scheme that Denis presented?

[ANN] - in the subject means announcement
[JOB] - means a job post

That way people can get their fill of the fun discussions regarding
group dynamics while filtering out the meaningless drivel such as
announcements and jobs ;)

-matt

ps - The job posts don't really bother me as long as they are
relevant.  It seems that the traffic arguing about posting policies
are far more common anyways.  I'd prefer not to subscribe to another
list.  (So you know where I'm coming from, I'm a lurker on many
mailing lists (40+) and don't always read every message.  I prefer
searching via gmail to sourceforge or other lousy interfaces)

On 1/26/07, Shannon -jj Behrens <jjinux at gmail.com> wrote:
> I fear that it may be too many mailing lists for too few people.  I do
> like the idea of old timers being able to stick to just one mailing
> list.
>
> Best Regards,
> -jj
>
> On 1/25/07, jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
> >     what happened to baypiggies-admin?
> >     I'd like that--for behind-the-scenes coordination
> > (e.g. explanations of how to get speakers, can
> > someone provide a {microphone,cable,pointer,...}).
> >
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> >
> > > On 1/25/07, Marilyn Davis <marilyn at deliberate.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ----- On Thursday, January 25, 2007 ylchobe at gmail.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 1/25/07, Chad Harrington  wrote:
> > >>>>> I propose:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I think a separate baypiggies-jobs list would be the best solution
> > >>>> to the
> > >>>> jobs issue.  90+% of BayPiggies members aren't looking for jobs and
> > >>>> would be
> > >>>> annoyed by lots of job posts. The remaining 10% are looking for
> > >>>> work and
> > >>>> would likely welcome a large number of jobs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you are looking for a job, you subscribe to the jobs list.  If
> > >>>> not, you
> > >>>> don't.  Seems like the simplest policy.  There is no value in
> > >>>> having job
> > >>>> listings go to the 90% who don't want them.
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> Just to clarify, the proposed job list will not have discussion or
> > >> announcements, just jobs, right?
> > >>
> > >> Then, JJ will have to be very hard-nosed about job-postings, *no*
> > >> job-postings on this list, but he can send them to the job list.
> > >>
> > >> If this is ok with JJ, who will have to be the cop, then:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> from me.
> > >
> > > +1 from me
> > >
> > > This is a summary of what I'm hearing:
> > >
> > > baypiggies-announce would contain:
> > >   * Meeting announcements for *just* BayPiggies.
> > >   * Reminders that we need speakers if we get low.
> > >
> > > baypiggies would contain:
> > >   * All of the above.
> > >   * Plus general Python chatter.
> > >   * People organizing the talks can use this list or break into
> > > private email as they feel is appropriate.
> > >
> > > baypiggies-jobs would contain:
> > >   * Python job postings.  The requirements would be a bit looser.
> > > That is, recruiters would be allowed.  Jobs outside the Bay Area would
> > > be allowed if relocation expenses were included or if the work could
> > > be done from the Bay Area.
> > >
> > > Do we have rough consensus?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > -jj
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://jjinux.blogspot.com/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Baypiggies mailing list
> > > Baypiggies at python.org
> > > To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/baypiggies
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://jjinux.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/baypiggies
>