[Baypiggies] New PyOP List
Shannon -jj Behrens
jjinux at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 00:11:32 CET 2007
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:26 PM, Doug Landauer wrote:
> >> Of course not. But the 65% might reconsider the wisdom of sticking to
> >> a name that 35% find unpleasant. We'll never know how many more find
> >> it too uncomfortable to join.
> >
> > We'll also never know just how much of an overestimate that 35% is.
> >
> > For what it's worth, there is a twenty-year-old "Psychology of
> > Programming
> > Interest Group" which has embraced the "pig" mascot ... see
> > http://www.ppig.org/
> > (they have a very cool little piggie favicon). It seems to me that if
> > experts in psychology are happy to embrace such a symbol, then we who
> > are
> > experts only in programming probably ought at least to let it slide.
> >
> > Just my opinion,
> > -- Doug L.
On 2/28/07, jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
>
> please, please let it slide--jj, help!
(playfully:)
Ok, I was trying to avoid putting my foot down, but I feel compelled
to. From hence forth, disparaging pigs will no longer be tolerated!
Consider:
* The DNA of pigs is well known to be extremely similar to the DNA of humans.
* Pigs are well known for their intelligence.
* Pigs are far smarter than pythons.
* Furthermore, they are far more trustworthy.
* They are able to survive in the most meager of conditions.
* Pigs are related to the wild boar, well known for its fierce independence.
* Pigs are gaining popularity as pets.
In summary, I will no longer tolerate open prejudice against pigs!
Let us embrace our namesake with much frivolous joy and celebration!
I, for one, am proud to be a piggy!
Best Regards,
-jj
--
http://jjinux.blogspot.com/
More information about the Baypiggies
mailing list