daryl.spitzer at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 16:57:20 CEST 2008
I haven't read the cookbook recipe (yet), but I thought you may find
http://daemonize.sourceforge.net/ useful. (I heard about it in a
PyCon 2008 lightning talk. I haven't tried it yet, though I expect I
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens <jjinux at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2008, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> > >
> > > The Python Cookbook has a pretty good module for daemonizing a
> > > process. It's not something that's likely to change, since this
> > > procedure has been the same for a decade or longer. Has anyone
> > > brought up the idea of including it in the standard library? I'm
> > > actually pretty surprised it's not there already.
> > There's been some discussion of adding a pyprocess module similar to the
> > threading library -- it probably should go with that. As always, patches
> > are welcome. ;-)
> I like the processing module. I personally think that's a good
> candidate for the standard library too. Personally, I think a
> daemonize function is different. If anything, I think the posix
> module would be a better fit.
> The code I'm referring to is in the Python Cookbook. It's trivial to
> provide a patch. I was just wondering if there was a reason it hadn't
> been done already. I know how hard it is to get things into the
> standard library, so I'm skittish.
> I, for one, welcome our new Facebook overlords!
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
More information about the Baypiggies