[Baypiggies] Python WSGI server comparison?
bpederse at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 23:24:07 CEST 2008
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Niall O'Higgins <niallo at unworkable.org> wrote:
> I'm looking into various Python WSGI servers. Currently I have been
> testing with 2.5's wsgiref server and this works fine for me.
> However, I don't have a clear picture of what should be used for a
> more 'production' environment, my impression is that the wsgiref
> server is not suited to this.
> I have found various lists of WSGI-capable servers on the web, but
> have no idea what the pros and cons are, or which are well-tested and
> At the moment I'm interested in pure Python servers, rather than
> Apache mod_python/mod_wsgi or fastcgi etc solutions.
> What are other people using? My requirements are pretty basic, its
> just a simple web service.
> Niall O'Higgins
> Software Enthusiast
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
hi, i like the cherrypy server as well. pretty sure it's python only
and it's been very stable in my experience. my only complaint is it
doest give "dude that's whack!" on a 500 error like the wsgiref does.
you can likely drop it in place of wsgiref like:
from cherrypy import wsgiserver
port = 3030
server = wsgiserver.CherryPyWSGIServer(('0.0.0.0', port), [('/',
More information about the Baypiggies