[Baypiggies] Frequently Argued Objections
Alex Martelli
aleax at google.com
Sat Jun 21 02:02:43 CEST 2008
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Shannon -jj Behrens <jjinux at gmail.com> wrote:
>> - Why such difficulty with extensibility?
>>
>> OK, there are cases that are valid, I don't know of a library that I can
>> natively read an OODoc spreadsheet in python where that exists in perl for
What about http://pypi.python.org/pypi/OOoPy/1.4.4873 ?
>> enough", and maybe there's no good-enough OODoc python library yet.
There are many (look on PyPi for OpenOffice) but I have had no need to
use any of them so I don't know whether they're "good enough" (but why
shouldn't they be? parsing XML from a zipfile is hardly rocket
science...).
>> Still, in terms of discovery, perl has CPAN, and perl folks seem to like
>> ... well no, they seem to tolerate it. Does Python need an improved
>> CPAN?
...
>> Still, I get "poor extensibility" as a top critique of python probably more
>> than anything else these days.
>
> The Python version of CPAN is PyPI. "easy_install whatever" will
Yep, it's really weird to see PyPi totally ignored in such "critiques".
I guess this boils down to the Python community as a whole being
really bad at marketing, even compared to the Perl one, much less the
Ruby one (the latter being great at it).
Alex
More information about the Baypiggies
mailing list