[Baypiggies] Stackless anyone?
jon at inklesspen.com
Tue Apr 28 18:54:05 CEST 2009
Indeed. Perhaps I overstated -- I don't consider open-source Stackless
to be useful for anything involving socket I/O, which is almost 100%
of what I do, so that's why I called it a toy. That could have been
said a bit more politely (and accurately), but I don't actually agree
with either of Shannon's suggested rephrasings.
On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, William Deegan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens
> <jjinux at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jon Rosebaugh <jon at inklesspen.com>
> > I did. The open source version is just a toy. Avoid.
> It's possible Christian Tismer has joined this mailing list. Let's
> avoid pissing off open source developers. Try to phrase your
> complaints more politely, such as "I didn't find the open source
> version of stackless suitable for my needs," or "I think the open
> source version of stackless Python is very exciting, but I didn't find
> it suitable for production use."
> Let he who has never written a bug throw the first stone ;)
> If a user group mailing list isn't the place for frank discussion,
> then I'm a bit concerned.
> Should we reopen the name of the group? baypiggies? (anyone remember
> the very long and drawn out threads on that)?
> My 2cents.
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
More information about the Baypiggies