[Baypiggies] Separate jobs list?
Shannon -jj Behrens
jjinux at gmail.com
Sun Aug 9 05:49:57 CEST 2009
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Aahz<aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009, Chad Harrington wrote:
>> Why don't we just have a baypiggies-jobs list? Job seekers can
>> subscribe, uninterested parties can enjoy the normal python
>> discussions on the baypiggies list. It is suboptimal to mix content
>> on this list. Is it terribly hard to set up a baypiggies-jobs list?
> If you look at the archives, I bet you find that discussion about jobs
> consumes about as much list traffic as the actual jobs posts. There
> simply isn't enough job posting traffic to justify a separate list; if
> there ever is, I will support creating a separate list.
I've noticed that we fuss about job postings a lot more on this list
than on other mailing lists. I'm on a few programmer-related mailing
lists that have no rules against recruiters at all, and there are a
bunch of job postings.
I propose we have these rules:
* Job postings should start with [JOB] so that people can filter them out.
* For the time being, recruiters are allowed.
* The job must still *actually use* Python, and it must be in the Bay Area.
* Any other rules I'm forgetting still apply.
In this life we cannot do great things. We can only do small things
with great love. -- Mother Teresa
More information about the Baypiggies