[Baypiggies] Separate jobs list?
hyperneato at gmail.com
Sun Aug 9 22:23:09 CEST 2009
I have an idea. Remove jobs from the list altogether. Then use the
Baypiggies website to allow/filter job offerings; this way the job postings
are off the mailing list ( which is nice ), the jobs can be clearly,
conveniently filtered/organized, and Baypiggies who are looking for work can
subscribe to the website page changes ( RSS or similar ).
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens <jjinux at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Aahz<aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009, Chad Harrington wrote:
> >> Why don't we just have a baypiggies-jobs list? Job seekers can
> >> subscribe, uninterested parties can enjoy the normal python
> >> discussions on the baypiggies list. It is suboptimal to mix content
> >> on this list. Is it terribly hard to set up a baypiggies-jobs list?
> > If you look at the archives, I bet you find that discussion about jobs
> > consumes about as much list traffic as the actual jobs posts. There
> > simply isn't enough job posting traffic to justify a separate list; if
> > there ever is, I will support creating a separate list.
> I've noticed that we fuss about job postings a lot more on this list
> than on other mailing lists. I'm on a few programmer-related mailing
> lists that have no rules against recruiters at all, and there are a
> bunch of job postings.
> I propose we have these rules:
> * Job postings should start with [JOB] so that people can filter them out.
> * For the time being, recruiters are allowed.
> * The job must still *actually use* Python, and it must be in the Bay
> * Any other rules I'm forgetting still apply.
> In this life we cannot do great things. We can only do small things
> with great love. -- Mother Teresa
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Baypiggies