[Baypiggies] Ban recruiters again?

Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Feb 22 20:11:40 CET 2010

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010, Roderick Llewellyn wrote:
> As one of the writers pointed out, companies like Facebook would much 
> rather have false negatives (bouncing qualified people) than false 
> positives (hiring incompetents). That will change when the economy moves 
> around and the pool of unemployed qualified candidates dries up. You'll 
> stop seeing the job postings with 'tude and the endless robotic hurdles 
> to jump over. Oh for the Clinton days again!!! :) 

Actually, my impression is that the pool of unemployed QUALIFIED
candidates has already dried up around here.  I was thinking this weekend
that it's time to re-enable the ban on recruiters.  Any opinions?
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"Many customs in this life persist because they ease friction and promote
productivity as a result of universal agreement, and whether they are
precisely the optimal choices is much less important." --Henry Spencer

More information about the Baypiggies mailing list