[Baypiggies] Ban recruiters again?
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Feb 22 20:11:40 CET 2010
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010, Roderick Llewellyn wrote:
>
> As one of the writers pointed out, companies like Facebook would much
> rather have false negatives (bouncing qualified people) than false
> positives (hiring incompetents). That will change when the economy moves
> around and the pool of unemployed qualified candidates dries up. You'll
> stop seeing the job postings with 'tude and the endless robotic hurdles
> to jump over. Oh for the Clinton days again!!! :)
Actually, my impression is that the pool of unemployed QUALIFIED
candidates has already dried up around here. I was thinking this weekend
that it's time to re-enable the ban on recruiters. Any opinions?
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Many customs in this life persist because they ease friction and promote
productivity as a result of universal agreement, and whether they are
precisely the optimal choices is much less important." --Henry Spencer
More information about the Baypiggies
mailing list