[Baypiggies] Ban recruiters again?

Simeon Franklin simeonf at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 21:06:44 CET 2010

I was under the impression we were still banning recruiters - I've
pointed a couple of recent posters to our Jobs Policy which still

Principals only, no recruiters...


Simeon Franklin

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010, Roderick Llewellyn wrote:
>> As one of the writers pointed out, companies like Facebook would much
>> rather have false negatives (bouncing qualified people) than false
>> positives (hiring incompetents). That will change when the economy moves
>> around and the pool of unemployed qualified candidates dries up. You'll
>> stop seeing the job postings with 'tude and the endless robotic hurdles
>> to jump over. Oh for the Clinton days again!!! :)
> Actually, my impression is that the pool of unemployed QUALIFIED
> candidates has already dried up around here.  I was thinking this weekend
> that it's time to re-enable the ban on recruiters.  Any opinions?
> --
> Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/
> "Many customs in this life persist because they ease friction and promote
> productivity as a result of universal agreement, and whether they are
> precisely the optimal choices is much less important." --Henry Spencer
> _______________________________________________
> Baypiggies mailing list
> Baypiggies at python.org
> To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/baypiggies

More information about the Baypiggies mailing list