[Catalog-sig] Prototype setuptools-specific PyPI index.
jim at zope.com
Mon Jul 23 13:36:45 CEST 2007
On Jul 22, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> WRT zc.buildout, refreshing a buildout with just ZODB installed in it
>> takes about 45 seconds for me using PyPI and about 5 seconds using
>> the experimental index.
> Can you kindly provide a measurement for the index at
> http://cheeseshop.python.org/simple/ as well?
Yup. So, ATM:
Using old PyPI takes about 1m5s
Using simple takes about 25s
Using ppix takes about 8s
- ZODB isn't the best example as it has download links to
www.zope.org, making it take longer than packages without offsite
links (relative to PyPI).
- I expect that the difference between simple and ppix *for me* is a
matter of geography.
Refreshing an empty buildout checks the zc.buildout and setuptools
packages. For that:
Old PyPI takes 25s
Simple takes 8s
and ppix takes .5s
Again, I assume that the difference between simple and ppix has more
to do with geography than the difference between serving statically
and dynamically. The simple page has more links on it than the ppix
page, because I haven't gotten around to scarf all links off of a
restructured-text rendering of long description. I doubt that makes
any difference. It will be interesting to try again after I fix that.
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Catalog-SIG