[Catalog-sig] Prototype setuptools-specific PyPI index.
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Jul 23 22:00:12 CEST 2007
> Yup. So, ATM:
> Using old PyPI takes about 1m5s
> Using simple takes about 25s
> Using ppix takes about 8s
> Again, I assume that the difference between simple and ppix has more to
> do with geography than the difference between serving statically and
> dynamically. The simple page has more links on it than the ppix page,
> because I haven't gotten around to scarf all links off of a
> restructured-text rendering of long description. I doubt that makes any
> difference. It will be interesting to try again after I fix that.
If you think that the /simple pages are correct, it might be easier to
just mirror them instead of doing all the work yourself.
I don't plan to take that service offline, unless experimentation
shows it has serious flaws.
More information about the Catalog-SIG