From fdrake at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 20:51:50 2007 From: fdrake at gmail.com (Fred Drake) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI appears down Message-ID: <9cee7ab80710011151r67250077o491adb5f1d32d858@mail.gmail.com> PyPI is down, as far as I can tell (so is the wiki). -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller From benji at benjiyork.com Mon Oct 1 20:39:49 2007 From: benji at benjiyork.com (Benji York) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI down Message-ID: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com> As is my sworn duty, I have the sad news to relay that PyPI is, regrettably, down. -- Benji York http://benjiyork.com From bernd.roessl at lovelysystems.com Mon Oct 1 21:04:36 2007 From: bernd.roessl at lovelysystems.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernd_R=F6ssl?=) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Catalog-sig] cheeseshop and pypi unreachable Message-ID: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com> Hey there, http://pypi.python.org and http://cheeseshop.python.org are not reachable. Both host can be pinged but the web is not responding. The actual problem is that my buildout is not running without one of this hosts. cheers, bernd -- Lovely Systems, Developer phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77 Schmelzh?tterstra?e 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20071001/5d359c28/attachment.htm From jim at zope.com Mon Oct 1 21:45:29 2007 From: jim at zope.com (Jim Fulton) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Catalog-sig] cheeseshop and pypi unreachable In-Reply-To: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com> References: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com> Message-ID: <2F8E6ACB-E798-46BE-B37B-EA2247FA442D@zope.com> Use http://download.zope.org/ppix/. Jim On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Bernd R?ssl wrote: > > Hey there, > > http://pypi.python.org and http://cheeseshop.python.org are not > reachable. Both host can be pinged but the web is not responding. > The actual problem is that my buildout is not running without one > of this hosts. > > cheers, bernd > > > -- > Lovely Systems, Developer > > phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77 > Schmelzh?tterstra?e 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria > > > > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig -- Jim Fulton Zope Corporation From VernM at berkeleyprocess.com Wed Oct 3 03:10:47 2007 From: VernM at berkeleyprocess.com (Vern Muhr) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:10:47 -0700 Subject: [Catalog-sig] How to make the Package index more useful Message-ID: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan> Greetings, I check the package index almost every day. More and more it seems to be filled with every single change that occurs to a few code basees (Zope, Plone, etc) no matter how trivial. I don't understand why these development teams don't have their own SIG to post this stuff to. It does makes sense to post major new releases to the Package Index. Often now, it seems that these minor package changes bump other packages off the bottom of the visible list, or at least make it a task to find anything of interest. Is anyone else annoyed by this? I mean this to be constructive input. I'm not dissing these developers. Best regards, Vern Muhr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20071002/bc1303b7/attachment.htm From pje at telecommunity.com Wed Oct 3 04:33:12 2007 From: pje at telecommunity.com (Phillip J. Eby) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Catalog-sig] How to make the Package index more useful In-Reply-To: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan> References: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan> Message-ID: <20071003023034.D4FC73A407A@sparrow.telecommunity.com> At 06:10 PM 10/2/2007 -0700, Vern Muhr wrote: >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8055A.3AF0387D" > >Greetings, > >I check the package index almost every day. More and more it seems >to be filled with every single change that occurs to a few code >basees (Zope, Plone, etc) no matter how trivial. I don't understand >why these development teams don't have their own SIG to post this >stuff to. It does makes sense to post major new releases to the >Package Index. Often now, it seems that these minor package changes >bump other packages off the bottom of the visible list, or at least >make it a task to find anything of interest. May I suggest using an RSS reader, such as Bloglines or Google Reader? These services will show you a complete history of changes, without any ability for you to "miss" anything. From martin at v.loewis.de Wed Oct 3 15:55:59 2007 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:55:59 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI down In-Reply-To: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com> References: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com> Message-ID: <47039F6F.1050605@v.loewis.de> > As is my sworn duty, I have the sad news to relay that PyPI is, > regrettably, down. Thanks. I still can't figure out what precise sequence of events causes that problem, but I added another criterion for restarting Apache which would have hit in this instance. Regards, Martin From paul at boddie.org.uk Tue Oct 23 01:06:31 2007 From: paul at boddie.org.uk (Paul Boddie) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:06:31 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI Front Page Package Ordering Message-ID: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk> Hello, I notice (at around 20071022T230500Z, as some might say) that PyPI is showing for "recent packages" the first 30 packages in the database sorted by ascending version number, or something similar. Perhaps some query isn't quite as it might seem. Regards, Paul From martin at v.loewis.de Tue Oct 23 06:36:51 2007 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:36:51 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI Front Page Package Ordering In-Reply-To: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk> References: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk> Message-ID: <471D7A63.30302@v.loewis.de> > I notice (at around 20071022T230500Z, as some might say) that PyPI is showing > for "recent packages" the first 30 packages in the database sorted by > ascending version number, or something similar. Perhaps some query isn't > quite as it might seem. Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed, it was not - an "order by" clause was missing. This is a fallback case only if "too many" recent releases are immediately set to hidden, so it was rarely tested. It's now fixed. Regards, Martin