[Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Metadata-Version in PKG-INFO
renesd at gmail.com
Fri Apr 17 04:15:53 CEST 2009
Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags?
Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on
Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a
2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com>
> 2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>:
> >> I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I
> >> am ccing this request to catalog-sig so
> >> they can add it if they think it's wise
> > How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3,
> > or as a subclassifier of LGPL?
> Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate
> one with the suffix.
> But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot
> of changes) ?
> Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3
> Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in
> our Trove classifier.
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Catalog-SIG