[Catalog-sig] [Python-Dev] Troubled by changes to PyPI usage agreement

[Ben Finney]

On 03-Dec-2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> Could I ask why you cced this to python-dev, too? I thought the last
> string of pypi related emails, we agreed the correct place for this
> was the catalog-sig.

I did consider that. But it seems this change is being asserted by the
PSF. At the least, it seems to need clarification by Python insiders
who may not be reading the ‘catalog-sig’ forum.

Sorry for not making the reason for the cross-post clearer.

-- 
 \          “I moved into an all-electric house. I forgot and left the |
  `\   porch light on all day. When I got home the front door wouldn't |
_o__)                                            open.” —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20091204/06000eb8/attachment.pgp>