[Catalog-sig] Package comments
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Nov 4 19:16:21 CET 2009
> Comments face a related issue which exposes the psychology a bit more
> clearly: there's a barrier to commenting (you have to register)
In the current implementation on PyPI, you also have to register to
participate in the rating.
> In my experience, this
> results in the opposite of the YouTube phenomenon: comments will tend
> to cluster strongly around the negative extreme of the spectrum
> (people who are very upset about something are generally willing to go
> to more effort to express their feeling than people who are very happy
> about it).
In the case of PyPI, experience so far shows the opposite: comments
are, in general, supportive of the package.
> * Since package maintainers are typically already pressed for time,
> it's unlikely they'll participate much even if granted the ability
> to do so, preferring instead the discussion and support channels
> they've already set up.
But this misses totally the point of the feature. If I have to research
the support channels first, and filter out technical discussions to
actually get to opinions, I might as well evaluate the package myself
> * But since package maintainers cannot currently respond to comments,
That's not true - they can.
> * Since package maintainers also cannot remove abusive comments
That's not true - they can issue a support request to remove a comment.
> * Since package maintainers have no way -- short of ad-hoc attempts to
> abuse package descriptions -- to point users toward more useful
> discussion forums, it's likely that at least some users will never
> discover such forums.
So you mean, the users have no way of finding out what the
support channels are? How are they then supposed to use them?
More information about the Catalog-SIG