[Catalog-sig] [PSF-Board] Troubled by changes to PyPI usage agreement

"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Jan 20 23:42:53 CET 2010

> Sure, the PEP can be used as basis for the decision process, but
> someone still has to make the decision to add a mirror or not
> and these people should be appointed to by the PSF - much like we
> have an infrastructure committee to see after the python.org site.
> The situation is a lot like with the Python trademarks:
> The good guys always come and ask for permission. The bad guys
> don't. 

With PEP 381, the bad guys won't get any attention. You can already
run as many public mirrors of PyPI as you want, but nobody will notice.

To become an official mirror, you have to ask for permission already;
see the PEP.

> In order to go after them we need a clear set of
> rules for setting up and running a PyPI mirror and disallowing
> setups that don't follow these rules.

See the PEP.


More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list