[Catalog-sig] PyPI down again...

Mathieu Leduc-Hamel marrakis at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 09:27:27 CEST 2010

Yeah for sure there's different implementation of Pypi in django or with
other framework.

You can check this one too: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/chishop/0.2.0

<http://pypi.python.org/pypi/chishop/0.2.0>But the question was not
necessarily how difficult it was to do it but if it would acceptable by the
community, but we are on the right list to discuss that.

have you try it, is it working properly ?

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar <
sridharr at activestate.com> wrote:

> On 2010-06-11, at 1:56 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > If you are willing to invest *a lot* of time, then it seems that
> rewriting PyPI in Django would make a lot of people happy, because
> > they claim they can't contribute to the current code base because
> > they don't understand that. I don't want to do such a rewrite on
> > my own because I *do* understand the code base (despite not having
> written it in the first place, so I think that if you really want
> > to contribute, you can learn how it works); it also violates Joel
> > Spolsky's principle of never ever doing rewrites.
> FYI: I just happened to stumble upon what claims to be a "re-implementation
> of PyPI" in Django:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/djangopypi/0.4
> -srid
> _______________________________________________
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100617/419b7f4f/attachment.html>

More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list