[Catalog-sig] [Proposal] Registered packages must provide the source code distribution on PyPI
Andreas Jung
lists at zopyx.com
Thu Jun 17 14:26:33 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> Note however that Andreas' proposal was to require that 'sdists' be
> uploaded. I personally won't use binary-only packages, but it has
> historically been true that PyPI was intended to support them, as well
> as to support registration of packages hosted offsite. Andreas'
> proposal doesn't address either of those cases.
A more precise requirement would be:
- upload the sdist if your package is open-source
- upload the official distribution package if you are package
is commercial
Basically...upload everything that you would also keep on your own
server as official distribution.
Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwaFHkACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwvJgCfW+Ar1vTYyNlDwXfuS31Jvl4M
fAsAnR9exynFltTLE0hVwTy7QH8rxvYC
=ldIp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100617/c1b09266/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Catalog-SIG
mailing list