[Catalog-sig] [Proposal] Registered packages must provide the source code distribution on PyPI
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Thu Jun 17 16:00:11 CEST 2010
Andreas Jung <lists at zopyx.com> writes:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > You'd outrule commercial packages that don't come with a source
> > distribution. PyPI is for everyone, not only for open source
> > packages.
> Commercial package are a special case - I agree. The majority of all
> PyPI are non-commercial.
That's irrelevant to whether an sdist is uploaded.
Rather, the majority of PyPI packages are free software; whether they
are commercial or not is a separate dimension.
Commercial is not the opposite of free; proprietary is the opposite of
free. Commercial and proprietary are not at all the same thing.
\ “Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything |
`\ that's even remotely true!” —Homer, _The Simpsons_ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Catalog-SIG